Mothers, Orient your Daughters to Independence and Self Worth . . .

. . . rather than focusing them on society’s empty trivialities such as glamour and becoming eye candy for men.

See The 5 Kick-Ass Women This Mom Dressed Her Daughter As Instead Of A Disney Princess

The only change I would make in the examples presented in the article would be to toss out Coco’s cigarette and add a civil rights activist such as Angela Davis or Rosa Parks.

Okay, I’ll stick my neck out here and go further than the article. At a much younger age for both girls and boys, I suggest orienting the TV programs they watch to subjects about nature (especially non-animated nature) and various subjects of science and cultures. As well, I suggest toys of a more intellectually-nurturing nature such as animals and science oriented toys, puzzles, and games. Avoid toys for boys such as guns, military hardware, and weapon/war figures. Avoid toys for girls such as fluffy dolls and tea sets.

As I’ve mentioned before, along with all this, it is important to teach them empathy for others and the value of sharing.

And before you mothers out there take up torches and pitchforks and come after me for stereotyping mothers, I know that there are many mothers who do much, if not all of the above. You, I salute! You are the path to a better future.

A Wealthy Man of True Integrity

This one speaks for itself.


If you like the trailer, please share.

If the Bible is the inerrant word of an inerrant god, then who really introduced evil into the world and why? If the Earth is only six to ten thousand years old, why is there such overwhelming, logically indisputable evidence of evolution?

Was Descartes wrong, and God was a deceiver, after all?

M. Jefferson (Jeff) Hale, a humanist professor of evolutionary biology, remains an unrepentant skeptic as the biblical Tribulation begins.

Wars, super storms, famine, disease, and food riots sweep the earth. Politicians, frightened by signs of the End of Days, scramble to make laws proving to God that they are worthy of salvation. A nationwide purge of liberal educators is implemented, and Jeff is on their hit list.

Jeff is curious about world events but unmoved by the mania and the purge. His only concerns are to enhance the intellectual maturity of his students, resolve his romantic ambivalence, and come to terms with the death of his estranged, fundamentalist father.

Yet, Jeff knows the answer to a question unasked, and as even as zealous forces move against him, he becomes the focus of an extraordinary event unforeseen even by God.

“The Empathy Imperative” is a philosophical/spiritual novel written in the spirit of the BBC/WGBH Boston production, “God On Trial,” a play written by Frank Cottrell Boyce, based on an event told by Elie Wiesel in his book, “The Trial of God.”

Paperback and Digital: (free chapter available)

ISBN-13: 9781626463226
Publisher:, Inc.
Publication date: 2/15/2013
Pages: 452

Believe It or Not, the World is Becoming LESS Violent

Let’s Get Past The Ancient Chauvinism

As a matter of understanding and a blow for universal empathy between the genders, I reblog this video.

Victoria NeuroNotes

Ten types of women Christian men should not marry.  This video/article was just brought to my attention.  Thanks Tim.

View original post 154 more words

THE GUANTANAMO DIARY: A Profile of Courage Under a Depraved U.S. Administration

Learn of the man with far more courage, honor, and empathy than the collective soul of a conservative nation:

Should there be Empathy for Terrorism?


Being an advocate of universal empathy and benevolent reciprocity, acts of sheer terror such as the Charlie Hebdo attack place me squarely on the horns of a dilemma, especially since I am opposed to the death penalty as well. So, since I do not shy away from cognitive dissonance, as I write this piece, I will attempt reconcile my seemingly opposing concepts. I turn to philosophy.

On one horn, I am a devotee of the John Stuart Mill School of Free Speech—a school of empathic thought that says, in Mill’s words:

If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.  –John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 2 – Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion.

Side note: It is clear to me that this mode of thought, in no small measure, influenced Jefferson and Madison when they crafted the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, the intent of which is laid out in Jefferson’s Virginia Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom. And that intent is the very heart of a constitutionally limited, representative democracy (a republic). I no longer see our nation as such, however, but that is an argument for another time.

Indeed, as Mill wrote concerning the “tyranny of the majority”:

John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill

Like other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyrant—society collectively, over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannizing (sic) are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices (sic) a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough: there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling; against the tendency of society to impose, by other means than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them; to fetter the development, and, if possible, prevent the formation, of any individuality not in harmony with its ways, and compel all characters to fashion themselves upon the model of its own. There is a limit to the legitimate interference of collective opinion with individual independence: and to find that limit, and maintain it against encroachment, is as indispensable to a good condition of  human affairs, as protection against political despotism. —John Stuart Mill, On liberty, chapter 1

Thus I have to say that Charlie Hebdo has, in my opinion, every right to lampoon fundamentalist Islam, bearing in mind that their parodies of Mohammad is not the root cause of the terrorist attack, but was a contributing factor.

On the other horn of my dilemma is the root cause of the Charlie Hebdo attack—that of the right of fundamentalist religions to preach and believe as they do—a religious teaching that encourages murder as revenge for perceived insults to Islam. Too, it is for the most part a mindset with which one cannot reason. This last point, of course, is the same for peaceful but still dangerous fundamentalist, religious beliefs of Western nations. If one is convinced that he will burn in an everlasting Hell if he does not abide by the doctrines he was taught to believe, how can anyone change his mind? Cannonballs of logic and reason will not dent his walls of dogma. But, has he the right to teach and build those walls for others?

This brings me back to Mill, who wrote:

First, if any opinion is compelled to silence, that opinion may, for aught we can certainly know, be true. To deny this is to assume our own infallibility.

Secondly, though the silenced opinion be an error, it may, and very commonly does, contain a portion of truth; and since the general or prevailing opinion on any subject is rarely or never the whole truth, it is only by the collision of adverse opinions, that the remainder of the truth has any chance of being supplied.

Thirdly, even if the received opinion be not only true, but the whole truth; unless it is suffered to be, and actually is, vigorously and earnestly contested, it will, by most of those who receive it, be held in the manner of a prejudice, with little comprehension or feeling of its rational grounds. And not only this, but, fourthly, the meaning of the doctrine itself will be in danger of being lost, or enfeebled, and deprived of its vital effect on the character and conduct: the dogma becoming a mere formal profession, inefficacious for good, but cumbering the ground, and preventing the growth of any real and heartfelt conviction, from reason or personal experience. —John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 2 – Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion.

Therefore, fundamentalist Islam does, indeed, have a right to teach its opinions, although Mill would not condone—nor would any person possessing even a molecule of humanity and reason—allowing it to act out its nefarious teachings.

The solution? By allowing radical and harmful ideas to be spoken, society, perceiving the danger, knows who to watch and to whom contrary opinions, especially those of empathy, must be conveyed. Still, there must be constraints, especially in fundamentalist Islam, to prevent harmful acts. If the individuals of the group are beyond reason, then society must protect itself, by any means necessary—although capture should be our primary concern.

However, terrorists who are captured should not be put to death, but imprisoned and detoxed, if possible, of their harmful concepts. If they cannot be detoxed, then they must remain in prison and be treated humanly.

This episode highlights why I promote the view that every individual should rid himself of all religious dogma, saving only the single concept of benevolent reciprocity: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This goes for Western nations as well. Our primary goal, above all, should be the elimination of poverty and corporate/government greed–the ultimate medium for radicalism to grow.

I welcome your arguments and corrections if you find any.

Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel that takes a critical look at justice, love, and mercy, and written in the spirit of the BBC/WGBH Boston film production, God On Trial. 

Based on

Let’s Have Empathy for Teachers, but Let’s Rejoice for Parents

Here is a slight deviation from seriousness (well, I reckon it’s serious for some).

I can add nothing to this hilarious clip!

Posted to YouTube by cheyenne Felicia.

Why I Think This World Should End – a video message by Prince Ea

I ran across this video just now and found that the message fit perfectly the theme of my blog. I invite all to listen closely all the way through. Comments will be appreciated.

I would only add that Prince Ea’s use of the word “love” in the video is synonymous with the word, “empathy.”

Empathy is the act of mentally projecting oneself into the mind of another and trying, as much as possible, to experience his life and environment as he sees and feels it. To understand his emotions, his hopes, and his constraints.

Empathy is much more than mere sympathy. It is brother/sisterhood with family, friends, and strangers. It is feeling for others as you would feel for your own young child. It is understanding the devastation that poverty, neglect, and indifference have on the world view of an impoverished child. What you would not want for your child, you would not want for all others. This is the concept to which Prince Ea points.

ANSWERS IN GENESIS: A Profile in Parasitism (AN UPDATE)

—-Updated from my original post, Answers in Genesis: A Profile in Parasitism.—-

The State of Kentucky has decided to extend no further tax incentives to Ark Encounters, a Christian fundamentalist theme park.

The Mask of Deception

           The Mask of Deception

Now, I understand that some folks might think the following is a continuing attack against Christianity in general and Answers in Genesis (AiG) in particular. On the contrary. I am only suggesting how I believe empathy could be applied to this situation such that the solution is in the best interest of everyone. That is, by the way, the purpose of the religion clauses of the First Amendment.

Fairness requires empathy, and empathy can only be derived from within.

First, with regard to AiG, note that no one is making any attempt to shut down its right to purchase property and have a theme park. First Amendment watchdog groups demand only that governments–federal, state and local–represent all of its citizens, without regard to their religious beliefs, their political opinions, or their financial standing. All working citizens pay taxes, thus, all citizens must have free access to commerce and must not be forced to subsidise sectarian religion.

Secondly, in the United States–as most of you know–all religions are to be treated equally under constitutional law. The only way this can be accomplished is for the government to remain neutral in matters of religion, (i.e., it cannot make laws respecting anyone’s religion).

When the courts attend matters of church and state separation, they reference the intent of the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses of the First Amendment, which may be found in Jefferson’s Virginia Act for Establishing Religious Freedom. Here is the excerpt pertinent to the AiG case.

Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time: That to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical . . . [note that Jefferson was a Deist, not a Christian]

How could this be more empathetic and fair to all citizens?

Now, with regard to AIG’s ongoing efforts to have the taxpayers of Kentucky pony up 10s of million$ more in tax breaks for its restrictive, fundamentalist Ark Encounters theme park, after Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) reminded Kentucky lawmakers, many times, that they were elected to serve all the people and not just fundamentalist Christians, the State backed out of further tax incentives for the park. AiG is now resorting to revenge attacks for being forced to abide by the Constitution.

From AU:

Answers in Genesis (AiG), a creationist Christian ministry, had applied for a 25 percent sales tax rebate through the Kentucky Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet for Ark Encounter, a theme park that will feature a 510-foot replica of Noah’s Ark. The application received preliminary approval, and since the project is expected to cost $73 million, final approval would have cost the state up to $18 million in sales tax revenue.

But the Ark Park sailed into stormy seas in August when Americans United informed the tourism cabinet that AiG had posted online an opening for a computer-assisted design technician to work at Ark Encounter. That job post has since been removed, but in the August description, AiG said applicants must submit a “[c]reation belief statement,” as well as “[c]onfirmation of [their] agreement with the AiG Statement of Faith.”

That “statement of faith” required potential AiG employees to affirm their belief that homosexuality is a sin on par with bestiality and incest, that the earth is only 6,000 years old and that the Bible is literally true. Anyone who doesn’t agree with those statements won’t be considered for the job. (Read more here.)

According to AiG’s own website, “The purpose of the Ark Encounter park is to point people to the only means of salvation from sin, the Lord Jesus Christ, who also is the only God-appointed way to escape eternal destruction.”

But after receiving word of the tax-break cutoff, according to AU, “AiG . . . said earlier this week that it would run 16 billboards throughout the state promoting Ark Encounter and attacking ‘intolerant’ groups like AU. AiG also said it bought a 15-second digital video display that will run in New York City’s Times Square.”

AiG feels that it has been attacked unfairly and is being denied its “right” to tax dollars from non-fundamentalist Christian people–the same folks they would bar from employment at the park, no matter what their qualifications.

I have to wonder, What would the politicians of Kentucky, who want to continue the tax breaks, do if a group of Muslim citizens wanted the State to give them tax incentives to establish a park dedicated to Islam? Would you think that the folks at AiG would object?

How do you feel about this? Does AiG have a right to tax dollars? Should all religions have that same right?

The Key Ingredient for Empathy is Understanding: Do Atheists Have Faith?

Do Atheists Have Faith?

tumblr_m81iz6Artd1qdbcn8If I had a nickel for every time someone told me that atheists have faith, too, I could quit my day job. Okay, so maybe that’s an exaggeration but I probably could at least afford a pretty decent steak dinner. It’s very frustrating to hear and it’s not for the reason the person saying it thinks it is.  This assertion doesn’t irritate me because it’s clever or insightful; it irritates me because it’s nowhere near as clever or as insightful as it sounds.  In fact, it’s a logical fallacy called equivocation.  I’ll explain what I mean by that in a second, but ultimately I’m not interested in talking about argumentation (well, maybe I am a little bit). I’m more interested in explaining how faith and reason represent two very different approaches to perceiving the world, and how they operate on very different principles.

Equivocation happens when . . .

read more at Do Atheists Have Faith?.


— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel exploring the nature of biblical, Divine Justice–as opposed to true justice. Was Descartes wrong and God was a deceiver, after all? What would the world be like if empathy, not self interest, were our primary motivating force?

THE RENAISSANCE OF MY LIFE: A Journey From Exclusive Faith to Enlightened Inclusiveness



Who does not love irony? Only those who can’t see it.

The following Preface is an edited version of the preface for The Empathy Imperative (soon to be republished as The Best of All Possible Gods).

My primary purpose in writing the novel was to demonstrate society’s disconnect between its sense of justice, mercy, and benevolence, and its theistic religious beliefs. Too, I wanted to suggest what the world might look like if the sentiment of universal empathy replaced self-interest, xenophobia, and domination (power) as our primary motivating force.

The Best of All Possible Gods

A revision of The Empathy Imperative

By Max T. Furr


In 1960, Bible study was offered as an elective in my public high school, and I, desiring to be counted among the faithful, faithfully elected to attend.

Having been raised a Bible-believing, saved-by-perseverance Methodist, I had no doubt that God was in His Heaven, that Adam was the first human being, that one of his ribs was appropriated to fashion his helpmate, Eve, and that humankind came by its various languages and range of complexions in one fell swoop at the Tower of Babel. I believed, as well, that two representatives of every species of animal on Earth held first-class tickets to a cruise aboard the good ship, Noah.

For me, there was no alternative but to believe such propositions because the fundamentals of the Judeo-Christian faith were what I was taught to believe from my diaper days. By the time I reached high school, I was vaguely aware of other religions through various derogatory comments I’d heard and condescending movies I saw, but that was as far as it went.

Perhaps, had an objective world religions course been offered in my school, my natural curiosity would have spurred my interest, but there was no such course. As for human evolution, it was never mentioned in biology or Earth Science. It was poetic irony, then, that my first serious theological doubt emerged from reading the Bible and thinking about what I read.

Late one night, as I lay in my bed after a hearty round of supplications for understanding, I repeatedly opened the Revised Standard Version at random, expecting God to give me a message by way of the first verse upon which my eyes fell. I did indeed get a message, but apparently, it was not from God. The verse that grabbed my attention was Revelation 13:8.

And all the inhabitants of the earth shall worship [the Beast], everyone whose name was not written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the lamb that was slaughtered.

I’d been taught from tot-hood that I had a choice to follow the ways of righteousness and be rewarded with an eternity in blissful paradise or to follow the ways of wickedness and reap an eternity of unrelenting, burning torture.

Yet, try as I might to rationalize otherwise, the only interpretation I could grasp from the verse was predestination. If that were so, I reasoned, then God knew before the existence of humans that most of them would be destined to eternal agony, no matter how good they may have strived to be.

“Why would God,” I asked myself, “condemn souls to Hell before they were born?”

The next day, I prodded the Bible teacher for a different interpretation of the verse. After a thoughtful pause, she replied, “We’re not supposed to know everything.” I was taken aback, as I had expected a bit more than a dodge, but I accepted it. Her answer, however, gave birth to another question. I wondered why a perfect god would not be perfectly clear in words He inspired someone to write and for reasonable humans to read.

I suppose the verse could have been interpreted as meaning the Book of Life was begun with the first human, and then each name was added as each person came into existence and demonstrated he was worthy of salvation. However, that would be salvation through works, not through grace, and it would cause a problem with the King James Version of the same verse, which states:

And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

This verse seemed to say the “Lamb”—taken to mean “Jesus”—was destined to be slain from the world’s creation. Therefore, although the wording was different, predestination was still painfully clear.

For some time after that, I pondered and prayed, reread the chapter, and pondered some more. In time, I moved on, but the questions remained resident in my mind.

Not long after high school graduation, I found myself in Army Basic Training. One afternoon on a weekend, as I lay on my bunk reading, some friends who knew me to be a devout Christian came in and asked me to assist them in a debate they were having with a professed atheist.

Never one to miss an opportunity to proselytize, I donned my godly armor of faith and sallied into battle. With my friends gathered around, I dodged and ducked every salvo of my foe’s arguments and responded with volleys of piety and scripture. The end of the battle came with a total rout—mine.

Thoroughly shaken, I laid out a smokescreen prophesying divine retribution for my faithless adversary and, embarrassingly, withdrew from the battle. Hastily applying a sturdy brain splint of seasoned prayer, I retreated for weeks into mental convalescence.

It had been my first contact with the enemy, and he had come to the field of battle with an awesome weapon entirely new to me—well-reasoned, evidence-based arguments of a very different reality.

His knowledge of the Bible was greater than mine, his knowledge of other religions was far beyond mine, and his knowledge of evolution caught my ship of ignorance broadside.

Bertrand Russell, British philosopher and atheist, wrote of Pierre Bayle, French philosopher and critic in the late 17th century, that Bayle would compose lengthy arguments on the strength of reason over orthodox belief but then conclude, “So much the greater is the triumph of faith in nevertheless believing.”

Perhaps such sentiments are necessary to soothe the troubled minds of millions, but for me, there was something deeply objectionable about willful self-deception.

This aversion to intellectual dishonesty seriously weakened the walls of my theology and set me up for the final blow—my own reasoned argument.

Having noted my air of piety, an acquaintance invited me off post to dinner and conversation at his home. That evening, seated in his living room, he and two others engaged in a concerted effort to convert me to Mormonism. Among other arguments, they contended that baptism into the Mormon faith was necessary to achieve salvation.

Marveling at their confident posture, I asked, “How do you know you are right?”

“We know in our hearts we are right,” they replied.

“Yes,” I responded, “but so do the Jews, the Hindus, the Buddhists, the Muslims, and the Catholics. They all know in their hearts that they are right. Every person of every religion believes himself to be right.”

After dinner, having made no commitment, I thanked them for their hospitality and took my leave. Returning to the base that night, something was bothering me, the cause of which I could not ferret out.

When I awoke the next morning, the insight came in a flash. The rebuttal I made to their heartfelt belief also applied to me.

The logic was clear; I had no more reason to believe I possessed the sacred truth than anyone else. I had grasped the indisputable fact that one’s religious beliefs have more to do with one’s happenstance of birth than with truth. People are most likely to believe the theology they were taught to believe by their parents, which is most often the predominant religion of the society into which they are born. And that belief is often unshakable for the rest of their lives.

A cascade of questions followed, the foremost of which was: Could there be a good and compassionate god who condemns billions of souls to eternal torture for having been taught to believe the wrong religion? Since adherents to other faiths believe their “truths” as passionately as the Christians, how do I know I was taught the right one?

I decided that very morning to place my faith in abeyance and view it with an objective eye. I would return to school as soon as possible and acquire a much wider breadth of knowledge so vital for sound reasoning.

I vowed to study with an open mind and follow the arguments to their logical conclusion. I promised myself that I would accept the conclusion no matter how uncomfortable it might make me feel, for if I refused to do so, I would live a life of intellectual dishonesty.

Throughout the ensuing years, I applied a strong dose of reason to each of my attempts to fashion a new theology.

In pursuit of truth, I opened my mind to philosophy, world religions and evolution. I read and contemplated the arguments of current and past theologians, scholarly evolutionists and noted philosophers.

During this process, I came across a famous statement by the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716). In an attempt to reconcile the existence of evil with the idea that God is all-loving, all-powerful and all-knowing, he suggested that God gave this world the best balance of all possibilities, good and evil. So that humans might act as free agents, He gave us the ability to choose between the two. Therefore, Leibniz concluded, it must be that God blessed us with “the best of all possible worlds.”

Leibnitz’s proposition that this is the best world possible stuck in my craw where it festered. I recall thinking about the human condition, the wars, the hungry masses, the disease-infested children, and the horrors humans inflict on their fellow humans and concluding Leibniz’s best possible world speculation was demonstrably false.

It was the age-old philosophical conundrum: If God is omniscient, then He knows of the intolerable suffering of billions of people through no fault of their own. If He is omnibenevolent, then it is reasonable to suppose He would want to alleviate at least the depth of suffering, especially that of children. If He is omnipotent, He could act on His desire. He does not alleviate the depth of suffering.

Therefore, either He is not omnipotent and can do nothing about suffering, or He is not omniscient and does not know humans suffer, or He is not omnibenevolent as most of the world, astonishingly, thinks Him to be. The final possibility is that He does not exist.

It was against Leibniz’s best-world view that I debated with my classmates throughout college and about which I began to write, post-college.

As I began writing and, considering again the best-world proposition, I realized that neither I nor anyone with whom I debated thought to ask the obvious questions: If this is not the best of all possible worlds, then could it be that we do not have the best of all possible gods? Too, if this isn’t the best world possible, what would a better world look like, and how could it be achieved. This question formed the seed from which this novel grew.

I do not presume that this story constructs the best of all possible worlds or gods, and indeed, I am sure it does not. But I do not need to construct the best of either. I just need to demonstrate that, theologically or humanistically, a better world is possible, just not in my lifetime.

I am well aware of considerable controversy in scripture analysis and translation, but my thrust is not to make arguments of interpretation. It is rather to demonstrate that theologically, a better world could have been created, and if a better world could have been created, then it follows that the god of the Bible—and by extension, the god of Judaism and Islam, Yahweh—was not the best of all possible gods.

A note of interest for the Christian true believer: when the Time of Sorrows begins, Professor Hale is a politically astute atheist and determinist (cause and effect—fate without supernatural guidance), explained in a thought soliloquy in the first chapter of part 1 as he attempts to avoid dealing with three unsavory events: the death of his estranged fundamentalist father, romantic indecision, and the onset of a nationwide political purge of liberal professors.

For the politically inclined reader, chapters two and three set up the political environment, suggesting what might happen if the political pendulum did not swing back, but became immobile far to the right, caught up in an entanglement of corporate greed and religious fervor intensified by what appears to be the beginning of the biblical Tribulation—the Time of Sorrows. The political theme mingles with theology and philosophy throughout part 1.

I do not presume to believe this book constructs the best of all possible worlds or gods, and indeed, I am sure it does not. But I do not need to construct the best of either. I just need to demonstrate that, theologically, better gods and better worlds are possible.

Since any such qualitative construct necessarily deals with ethics and justice, I must deal with questions relevant to the omniperfection of God, and it is with this discussion that I feel a word to the wise reader is necessary.

I am well aware of considerable controversy in matters of scripture analysis and translation, but my thrust is not to make arguments of interpretation. It is rather to demonstrate that, again theologically speaking, a better world could have been created, and if a better world could have been created, then it follows that the god of the Bible, Yahweh, was not the best of all possible gods.

I am sure many will say that I cannot judge the acts of God described in the Old Testament by modern, ethical standards, but they will be wrong.

I am exploring Judeo-Christian theology and embracing the popular notion that the god of the Old Testament is the same god of the New Testament whose being and temperament do not change.

I am proceeding with the idea that we believe our sense of morality and justice is good, and that it is God sanctioned. Therefore, in order to conduct this theological exploration honestly, I must view events in the Old Testament through the moral lens of modernity.

— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel that brings the true nature of justice, mercy, and love into sharp focus.  What would the world be like if universal empathy, not self interest, were our primary motivating force?

FREE CHAPTER of “THE EMPATHY IMPERATIVE,” A Philosophical/Theological Novel


What would the world be like if there were no religions and our primary motivating force was not self interest, but universal empathy? How, theologically, could such a world be realized?

Written in tribute to, and in the spirit of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984

What would our world be like if our primary motivating force was neither self-interest nor religion, but the concept that the sages and most religions suggest; universal empathy? How could such a world be realized?

About the Book

The story opens as the biblical tribulation begins, and even as world disasters increase in frequency and strength, Mark Jefferson Hale, professor of philosophy and evolutionary biology, remains an unrepentant skeptic. He cannot believe it is true. There is too much evidence in support of evolution and against biblical literalism.

Jeff’s primary concerns are neither the growing power of religious extremism in politics, triggered by signs of the End of Days, nor even the ongoing political purge of liberal professors as politicians strive to prove to God that they are worthy of salvation.

His only concerns are to enhance the intellectual maturity of his students and to find a resolution to his romantic ambivalence, all the while fighting against the onslaught of grief triggered by the death of his estranged, fundamentalist father.

 Yet, Jeff knows the answer to a question unasked, and as humanity’s darkest hour approaches, he captures the attention of the greatest power in the universe, the consequence of which will change everything, for all time.

 The Empathy Imperative

 Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must approve the homage of reason rather than of blindfolded fear.

(Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Peter Carr, 10 Aug. 1787, Lower case “g” in “god” retained)


Copyright © 2013 Max T. Furr

ISBN 978-1-62646-322-6

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the author.

Published by, Inc., Bradenton, Florida.

Printed in the United States of America.

The characters and events in this book are fictitious. Any similarity to real persons, living or dead, is coincidental and not intended by the author., Inc.


First Edition


Preface. vii

Part One

Chapter 1 – In the Fullness of Time

Chapter 2 – Spirits in the Wind

Chapter 3 – Plato’s Lament

Chapter 4 – Corporatocracy

Chapter 5 – Signs

Chapter 6 – Hale’s Epiphany

Chapter 7 – Amanda’s Song

Chapter 8 – Of Inquisitions and Pig Farms

Chapter 9 – Atonement

Part Two

Chapter 10 – The Anomalies

Chapter 11 – The Coming

Chapter 12 – A Court of Answers

Chapter 13 – Creation and Fall

Chapter 14 – The Day of the Great Confusion

Chapter 15 – The Accursed Thing

Chapter 16 – A Question of Justice

Chapter 17 – The Son of Man

Chapter 18 – Summation and Closing Argument

Chapter 19 – Recompense

Chapter 20 – Dining with the Gods


Chapter 9 – Atonement

Chapter 9

(Two years later)

For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. (Leviticus 17:11, AV)

Peter John Latterday was troubled. It can’t possibly be true, he thought as he watched the news in the office of his Florida mega-church. It’s a fantastic coincidence!

On the screen, FCNN’s Ted Robertson was reporting on TiConGlobal’s sweeping acquisition of the last six multinational corporations in existence. The buy-out created one global corporation comprised of seven divisions, including the parent division, TiConGlobal itself.

The beast with seven heads. Surely it can’t be! Latterday thought.

On the screen, Robertson gushed with enthusiasm that TiConGlobal will now control virtually every aspect of human wants and needs in all nations except for Muslim theocracies.

He gave a brief description of the Corporation’s new organizational structure. Each division will continue as before in their particular field of activity: agriculture and textiles, construction, pharmaceuticals and health, transportation and shipping, energy, communications and security. TiConGlobal itself will function as the administrative, financial, and legal arm for the entire corporate body, as well as provide for government interface. Its previously competing functions will be distributed to the appropriate divisions.

Robertson turned to the large monitor behind him that was live-streaming three guest panelists. He began to question each of the three. He wanted to know what impact the merger would have on the world’s economy, and about what changes might TiConGlobal bring to the United Christian States of America.

As the crawler at the bottom of the screen drew his attention, Latterday barely heard the questions. He mouthed the words as they moved across the screen, “Antony Kareen Jordan, President and CEO of TiConGlobal, announced this morning that the Corporation will bring the nations of Islam into the global community as equal members, and there will be prosperity, lasting world peace, and freedom for all nations.”

“A lie,” Latterday hissed at the screen. “The only way you’ll control Muslim countries is to kill all the Muslims, and I expect after they take out Israel, you will!”

He thought of the increasing number of brushfire wars around the globe and the wars still raging in the Middle East, threatening to expand into a regional conflagration centering on Israel.

“The liar talks of peace when anyone with ears and eyes understands that war and hunger are tearing this world apart.”

The war in the Middle East is essentially asymmetric, with the advantage favoring the Muslims. InterSeF’s air force is grounded most days of the month by the ever-present ash cloud. When they did fly, it was at an altitude low enough to come within range of ground fire, which left almost no warning time to evade surface-to-air, heat seeking missiles.

The Muslims claim that the detonation of the Aira Caldera, which created the ash cloud two years ago, is proof that Allah is with them. Never mind that they are having their own share of disasters.

Latterday counted the letters in Jordan’s three names. There were six in each. He flipped open his bible and thumbed to Revelation 13. Skimming down the page, he found the eighteenth verse: “Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.”

“No!” he mumbled at the page. “That really means nothing. Ronald Reagan’s names were composed of six letters each and it meant nothing.” Or did it? He thought. Wasn’t it the Reagan presidency that began the march to deregulation, to globalization, and to an unfettered free-market—policies that made the eventual rise of TiConGlobal possible?

The thought occurred to him that Reagan and Jordan could be the same entity—the beast. He dismissed the thought as absurd and listened again to the interview. They were discussing Jordan.

The male panelist called him a walking mystery, noting that he was wholly unknown to the world just three weeks ago and seemed to have come from nowhere. Indeed, his name came to prominence only when Santerra Ag, the last holdout multinational corporation, acquiesced to TiConGlobal’s buyout offer.

“The deal was reached,” the panelist reminded the viewers, “yesterday morning at an unscheduled meeting of the Santerra Ag board of directors. Jordan was present with a final buyout offer. The meeting followed the apparent suicide of fifty-eight year old Milo Hampton, former president and CEO of Santerra Ag.

“Hampton had been the major obstacle to TiConGlobal’s bid. His son, Ted Hampton, had been an outspoken opponent as well until his father’s sudden death. Although the circumstances and timing of the apparent suicide raised suspicions, according to the InterSeF report, there was no evidence of foul play.

“Milo Hampton’s wife, Monique, said he awoke about twelve thirty yesterday morning and rose from the bed. She asked him if anything was wrong, but he said nothing. He left the room, and minutes later she heard a loud noise downstairs. Investigating, she found him in his study.

“The report did not elaborate on the cause of death, but I got it from an anonymous source that he apparently killed himself with his antique, frontier Sharps buffalo gun. He had a substantial weapons collection, but the Sharps was his favorite.

“After questioning Mrs. Hampton and others, it was apparent that no one had any idea he was depressed.

“The other members of the board,” the panelist continued, “apparently knew nothing of the death until the meeting was convened, at which time it was announced by Ted.

“Oddly enough, a move to postpone merger negations was nixed by Ted, saying that his father would have wanted the meeting to proceed. It did proceed, but didn’t last long. According to my source, the persuasiveness of Jordan’s oration was nothing short of phenomenal, swinging every board member to favor the buyout.”

At first glance, Jordan appeared to be a rather unlikely person to have acquired such a position with TiConGlobal. He was thirty-two years old—astonishingly young—Greek-god handsome, about six foot four, impeccably dressed, carried a toned body of medium build, and exuded a personable manner that could alleviate the deepest of one’s anxieties.

On the screen, one of the women panelist, apparently an opponent of TiConGlobal’s unbridled power voiced her doubts about Hampton’s suicide and cautioned that Jordan’s rhetoric could seduce any and everyone who listened with an innocent ear. “We should beware of him,” the panelist said. “We know nothing of him except what the Corporation released. I can find no record of his past from any independent source. I have a bad feeling about him. He’s too perfect and he’s too smooth. No one can say ‘no’ to him, unless somehow Milo . . .”

She was cut short by the other panelists, all loudly talking at once. They attacked her as just another paranoid liberal, hatching conspiracy theories.

The male panelist bully-voiced the others into silence as he stated loudly and with admiration that Jordan possessed an uncanny ability to remember everyone’s name and the names of their family members. “One person I interviewed—a Jon Wilmore—said Jordan stopped him as they passed in the hallway, called him by his name, put his hand on his shoulder, and asked with obvious sympathy how his son, Daniel, was doing in the hospital.

“Wilmore was mystified at how Jordan knew his name, his son’s name, and that his son was in the hospital. Wilmore said it was ‘downright spooky.’ He said there is no reason why Jordan should know him, because he was not a prominent figure at Santerra Ag. In fact, he was one of thousands of middle managers from deep in the accounting department, and it was the first time he had ever seen Jordan in person. The man is absolutely phenomenal.”

The other woman panelist, an apparent corporate insider, said the most frequent comment she heard from those who made his acquaintance is that they felt as though they had been close friends with him all their lives.

“What’s not to love?” she cooed as she slowly shook her head. “And he’s oh so drop-dead handsome. And by the way,” she said, giggling, “he’s single.”

Latterday watched the presentation with increasing apprehension. One panelist spoke of the Corporation’s Paris celebration. It was obvious that plans for the gala had been in the works for months, because it commenced within an hour after the final acquisition concluded.

The panelist said that it was a celebration, the likes of which were unmatched in the history of the world. All of Paris came alive in merriment. Champagne flowed like a river as men in tails, with carts laden with hors d’oeuvres and wine, appeared on virtually every major street corner. Restaurants threw open their doors. Orchestras and bands played throughout the city, throughout the evening. All of this was provided free of charge, courtesy of the Corporation.

People danced, drank, and partook of all manner of pleasures, even to acts of a lascivious nature in theaters open to the public. The panelist was quick to add that he’d obtained the report from a “reliable source,” who had added that at least one such event broke down into a drunken orgy.

To Latterday, the debauchery was bad enough, but to add to his alarm, the panelist then stated that during the evening the earth experienced an unexpected and intense meteor shower during which many fireballs, at a rate of six to eight a minute, lit up the night sky directly over Paris and all of north-central France. People everywhere shouted with glee that this was a sign that even God was pleased with Jordan.

Latterday thumbed to Revelation 13:13 “And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.”

He looked back at the screen, searching his mind for more evidence. He recalled TiConGlobal’s advertising campaign featuring the latest, erotically beautiful rock star. So brilliantly choreographed were the ads that her skimpily clad body in seductive dance became almost synonymous with the Corporation. Could this be the Whore of Babylon riding the Beast?

Of course not. Damn it! I’m getting a bit daft—beginning to believe my own preaching.

He thought of turning off the television, but could not. He listened again to the panel. Under Jordan’s leadership, a new corporate logo bearing Jordan’s full name would soon adorn almost all clothing—sometimes on an inside tag, but most often as a monogram, embroidered on the outside.

The corporatist female panelist happily reminded everyone of the wonderful fact that from now on, there will be only one credit card, and it will bear TiConGlobal’s logo, as well as the name “Antony Kareen Jordan” in beautifully stylized calligraphy. It will be issued by the World Bank, the financial arm of corporate headquarters.

The move is on to make the card the only means of financial transactions throughout the world. There will be no more need of paper or metal money. Instead, the Corporation will issue Corporate World Credits, held in personal accounts at the World Bank, and people will conveniently purchase, anywhere in the world, whatever they wish.

Latterday’s eyes dropped to Revelation 13:17 “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

“Television . . . deactivate!” he forced himself to say. The screen went black. He opened the bottom right drawer of his desk. “I really need a drink,” he said, listening to the anxiety in his own voice. He pulled out a bottle of Jack, plucked up a glass, and pressing the neck of the bottle firmly against the rim to steady his shaking hands, poured it half full.

He took a long sip, closed his eyes, and sat back. Feeling the liquid heat flowing down his throat, he tried to calm himself, to think clearly, to use reason.

He recalled the first event that gave him pause. Two years ago, the Aira Caldera on the island of Kyushu exploded. Over twenty million people died from the initial blast, the tsunami, and from the scalding ash that fell over southern Japan and eastern China, and the earth is still experiencing the devastation caused by the ash cloud—a cloud made worse by volcanoes of lesser size erupting at ever-increasing rates on every continent.

Latterday took another long sip and closed his Bible. He considered these things in concert with other disasters around the world in the past two years, ever increasing in strength and frequency. There is no money left for aide, and too many disasters to address. The tsunami generated by the Japanese super volcano was rather mild once it hit California’s west coast, killing or washing out to sea three hundred sixty-three people.

Then San Francisco was devastated six months ago by an earthquake measuring 8.85 on the Richter scale. Even buildings built to withstand quakes as great as the one in 1906 collapsed into rubble, many toppling over onto smaller buildings. Fifty-three thousand people lost their lives.

At first, he’d passed it all off to natural events and fought against any other conclusion than fantastic coincidences. Yet as the frequency of disasters increased, he felt his own End Times sermons eating away at his skepticism, leaving behind the hollowness of uncertainty.

Latterday was a showman, living the very meaning of divine decadence. He had fine cars, a twenty-million dollar home on the ocean near Cape Canaveral, and a six-million dollar estate in the North Carolina Mountains. He had a corporate jet, a yacht, diamond rings, Rolex watches, the finest clothes, and the most beautiful, voluptuous wife—his happily sad, weeping sidekick—money could buy. Of all he had, he considered her his best investment. The money that flowed into his coffers every time she shed her golden tears on his television network had boosted his net worth several times over.

“God has blessed me,” he would tell his pious flock, and they—many of them poor and needy—marveled at how much he was blessed. They gave him money they could ill afford in hopes God would bless them too. Latterday promised them He would, though if not on earth, then in Heaven. He didn’t think of it as selling snake oil. As he reasoned with himself, he was selling them something they sorely needed. He was selling them hope, and that was priceless.

Every Sunday his mega church would fill with true believers. Latterday knew many of them came seeking a moment’s respite from the sorrows and drudgery of everyday life. He would give them that. He knew others came to satisfy themselves that their past sins were absolved so they could get a fresh start sinning again on Monday. But there were those, too, who came to be healed by faith through Latterday’s laying-on-of-hands. He knew, as well, that all came to placate their insecurities.

He thought of how much he was adding to their faith with what he thought of as his “healing show.” Every Sunday there would be supplicants with a variety of physical woes. His wife would greet them as they arrived at the entrance. Those desiring to be healed would invariably mention their names, ailments and other details, which she secretly recorded. Then she would leave them with some doubt that they would be among those healed, and have them join the congregation gathering in the pews.

During each sermon, Latterday would periodically pause, lower his head, place a hand on his forehead, and then announce to the congregation that God had requested a specific person, whom he would call by name, to come forward. The surprised supplicant would rise and come forward, nervous and awed that Latterday knew her name and specific malady. It was obvious. God was speaking to him. She and the audience just knew it to be true.

But it wasn’t the voice of God, of course, it was the voice of his wife backstage, transmitting to the hidden receiver in his ear. But the tension building in the supplicant, knowing that she had garnered the attention of the greatest power and authority in the universe, ensured that when Latterday shouted, “heal,” or ordered that the “demons depart,” and popped her on the forehead with the palm of his hand, or blew in her face, she would obligingly faint dead away.

Latterday was born Peter Bradford Drummond, and from his earliest childhood, his parents faithfully immersed him in the blood of Jesus. Upon reaching school age, they enrolled him in a Christian academy where, with careful nurturing, he excelled. Upon graduation, he matriculated to a theological seminary from which he graduated with honors—and disbelief.

The disbelief had come as a result of his earnest and uncompromising desire for intellectual honesty. Beginning his seminary schooling as a serious believer, he strove to strengthen his faith with evidence in order to convince others of the Truth.

He studied the religious philosophers and the theologians, and he studied the counter arguments available to him in the seminary library and on the Internet. It was on the Internet that he came across a rogue site allowing the viewer to read banned books. Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion was one of those offered, and he was fascinated. He had heard and read a great number of derogatory remarks about Dawkins throughout his education, and here was firsthand knowledge of what this prominent atheist thought. Not daring to download the book for fear of detection, he read it online, and it shook his faith.

The arguments of the unbeliever forced him to probe deeper into his theology. In his drive to find objective truth, he acquired a working knowledge of Latin, Greek, and ancient Hebrew in order to study translations. His driving force was the unbeliever’s claims of numerous misinterpretations, not the least of which was the mistranslation of the ancient Hebrew word “alma,” which means, “young woman,” in reference to Mary, Jesus’ mother.

He found that Dawkins was correct. In fact, it turned out to be a well-known error. When the old Hebrew word “almah” was translated to Greek, the word “parthenos” was used, which means “virgin.” He could find no evidence whether this was an honest mistake in interpretation or a deliberate deception to make Jesus’ birth a miracle. In either case, the translation was wrong.

Drummond found it difficult to understand why teachers of Christianity didn’t consider this a rather significant error, for it placed in serious doubt a major cornerstone in the foundation of Christian theology. It is quite likely that Mary was indeed a young woman when she conceived, but stating so in prophesy would have been irrelevant and unnecessary. Ancient Hebrew scholars, such as Isaiah, were meticulous in specificity. If Isaiah had intended to prophesize the miracle of a virgin birth, then he would have used the word, “Bethulah,” which meant, “virgin.”

During this period of objective research, Drummond discovered numerous other problems, including factual errors and contradictions. It was all quite devastating. What he was taught as a child simply was not true. It was a fabrication about which theologians and erudite preachers simply do not tell. The obvious next question was; Could any of the details in biblical stories be trusted? How could anyone possibly know with certainty?

Drummond was on the horns of a dilemma. He had a decision to make. Either he could refocus his life in another direction, throwing out all of his expensive theological education, or he could continue to walk his planned path and keep his discovery to himself.

For Drummond, to be a deceiver was unacceptable. Yet he had come so far, and tens of millions of people find abiding comfort in believing as he once had. Still, to continue to pursue a career in Christian theology would have him living a lie. And there was a more immediate and overriding issue to consider. He was deeply in debt to the Corporation for student loans. He simply couldn’t afford to start again.

Deciding to seek help, Drummond took his dilemma to the headmaster. After voicing his quandary, the old professor sat silent for a moment, looking with furrowed brow down at his folded hands. “Peter,” he said at last, looking up, “when I was a student, I made the same discovery as you, and to tell the truth, I’m quite sure all scholars of Christianity have as well. A few chose to disbelieve the translations were in error, and ignore the other problems, devising arguments in defense of what they had been taught—willful self-delusion, you might call it.

“Nevertheless, I accepted the mistranslations, the contradictions, and the invalid historicity, for what they were. I chose, as have, I suspect, most biblical scholars, to perpetuate the deception as a Noble Lie—very much as Socrates suggested.

“Peter, where would the poor, the tormented, the lonely and the down-trodden be without hope of salvation? How would they find their way in the darkness of an uncertain and unforgiving world, without a guiding light? Given man’s insensitivity and lack of empathy for his fellow man, it is obvious that the world isn’t going to change. Should the hopeless be offered no hope at all?

“Peter,” he continued, “it is for us who know these things to hold the lamp of hope high, to strengthen their belief in that wonderful world to come. Think of it. They’ve bound themselves inextricably to their belief in the hereafter and in a Master who truly loves them. They hold that belief deep in their hearts. It gives them comfort in times of sorrow. To tear that belief from them would be to destroy their last thread of hope, indeed, to destroy their very lives. Besides, even if Christianity is wrong, it doesn’t mean there is no God, and the evidence, as I see it, nebulous as it may be, favors a universal Intelligence.

“Thus, we who know, believe it is an honorable thing to perpetuate Christianity. What possible harm can it do?

“Peter, what would you say to a dying person, especially a child, who calls out to you?”

Peter didn’t have to think twice about that. “I’d tell a dying person, especially a child, whatever he wants to hear that might give him comfort.”

“Even if it were a lie?”

“Yes, even if it were a lie.”

When Peter left the office, the decision was made. He opted to continue with his theological education, convinced that he would bring hope to the lonely, the sick, and the hopeless by the propagation of the Noble Lie. It was the highest of virtues, greater even, than truth itself.

After graduating at the top of his class, he accepted an invitation to join the seminary staff. He taught comparative theology for two years, and on Sundays filled in as a substitute pastor for local churches.

Peter found that he had a natural talent for the pulpit and soon there was standing room only wherever he preached. Because he chose to baptize folks in the river rather than the baptismal pool in the church, believers likened him to their concept of John the Baptist. He liked that. In addition, because the bulk of his sermons concerned the End of Days, some folks began to call him Reverend Latterday. It caught on, and he liked that too.

Thus, at the end of his second year of teaching at the seminary, Peter resigned. He changed his name to Peter John Latterday, and began a traveling tent revival throughout the South and West. The positive response from the folks in every town was nothing short of extraordinary.

It was in those days that Peter began to change. He found that the more fire he breathed into his sermons, the more money adorned the plate. Preaching soon became more show than a craft of compassion, and the nobility of his mission diminished inversely proportional to the rising level of his coffers, awakening in him the demon of hedonism—the demon of self indulgence.

He evolved a taste for finer things, and his budding wealth convinced folks that he was a man blessed by God. After all, a man blessed by God is a man God blesses with finer things. It was called Prosperity Theology. The Book of Job was proof enough.

His stage became more posh—red-satin drapes everywhere, a shiny, golden cross on the pulpit, and an ornate throne upon which he sat as the curtain rose at the beginning of each show.

After four years working his traveling faith show—as he thought of it—he arranged to have a church built in Florida on the beach near Cape Canaveral. To garner a much larger audience, he founded his own television ministry.

The church would be large and impressive, such as to inspire a greater number of true believers to swap cash for absolution, and the television ministry would extract cash from a far greater audience.

Once the church was built, he shut down his traveling faith show, purchased a lavish estate, set up his TV ministry, and proceeded to build his fortune.

Now, as Latterday watched the news and thought of the biblical events foreshadowing the End of Days, it seemed to him that it was all coming to pass.

He rose from his desk and paced the floor, considering, reasoning, rejecting, accepting, then rejecting again the possible truth of Revelation. With each thought that it was true came a feeling of foreboding so deep his very soul rebelled against it. “It can’t be!” he said repeatedly.

The phone on his desk intoned a call. Moving to it, he noticed the blinking red light on the receiver, indicating the call was encrypted. He punched the appropriate line button and keyed the speaker.

“Yes? Latterday here,” he said, halfheartedly.

“Dr. Latterday,” came the voice of a man obviously anxious about something. “Thank God I got through to you. I’m Foster Johnston. I’m a Computer Program Engineer at NASA. I’ve been to your church . . . several times lately, but that’s not why I called.

“Have you heard about the mission NASA’s mounting; the one they say is taking supplies to the moon base? It’s on the news, but they don’t know what it’s really about—the real mission, I mean. The secret mission.”

Latterday was interested. He plucked up the receiver. “What’s the secret mission?”

“Uh, I’m not supposed to be telling anyone about this, but I know you to be a man of God and won’t tell anyone . . . but I have a question first. I have to know . . . is this the End of Days . . . I mean, you know, the end of time? You’ve been preaching that it’s very near—signs and all that—that we’re even now in the tribulation with all that’s going on around the world and that something big will happen soon.”

Latterday was becoming impatient. “Yes, yes. I’ve been preaching that. What’s the secret mission?”

“Well, do you recall about two years ago, the robotic mission to the asteroid Apophis? The news release said it was going to make a close flyby for a scientific study of its composition.”

“Yes, I recall hearing something about that.”

“Well, the mission was not to study Apophis, Dr. Latterday . . . it was to study Dolos, another asteroid. The asteroid’s on a collision course with us . . . with earth! They sent the probe to determine its composition and precise trajectory so they could decide how to deflect it.

“They already knew its size—fifteen kilometers in diameter . . . that’s a little over nine miles! The one that killed off the dinosaurs was just a bit smaller, though this one isn’t quite as dense, but it will still be capable of blasting a hole in the earth several miles deep.”

The caller paused, but Latterday said nothing. He was stunned to silence. He no longer doubted that this was indeed the End of Days.

“That’s the reason for the mission,” said Johnston. “They’ve determined how to deflect it. They’re going to try a kinetic impactor deflection. The vehicle now on the pad is the mother ship. It’s going to orbit the asteroid, then launch a one-ton missile to crash into it. If that fails for any reason to move the asteroid enough, the mother ship will move in close and detonate a one hundred megaton, full-yield nuclear device in an attempt to either vaporize it, or shatter it into small pieces.”

Latterday still found no words.

“Sir, if they can’t deflect the asteroid . . . if the mission fails, Dolos will destroy at least a third of everything on earth—humans included—just like the Book of Revelation says. What’s not destroyed immediately by the impact, the rain of fire from debris thrown into the atmosphere will come back down and burn hundreds of millions of people to death.

“Dr. Latterday, this is the End of Days, isn’t it? God won’t allow Dolos to be deflected, will He?”

Still holding the receiver to his ear, Latterday slowly rounded his desk to his chair and sat down hard. His mouth was dry. He felt weak and nauseous.

“Isn’t this the End of Days?” persisted Johnston.

“Yes . . . yes . . . I think . . . I think so,” Latterday heard himself say as his mind sank into the very bowels of self-loathing and remorse. This is the final piece of evidence, he thought. It’s coming! It’s all true, and I have not believed. My God, I did not believe you!

The caller fell silent, waiting for him to say something.

Latterday collected himself. “Thank you,” he said softly, feeling tears welling up. “Thank you for the information. And no, I won’t tell anyone, and I certainly won’t give anyone your name.”

“Thank you, sir,” came back an equally soft voice. “If you need to call me for any reason, I can give you my cell phone number.”

Latterday said he did, and the engineer gave it. He wrote it down.

“I’ll . . . I’ll see you in church this Sunday,” said Johnston.

“I appreciate that,” said Latterday. “I’m looking forward to meeting you in person. Please come to my office after service. I’ll tell security to let you pass.” He heard the engineer thanking him again as he returned the receiver to its cradle.

Feeling numb, Latterday sat back, staring at the phone. After a long moment, he looked up at the gold cross on the wall to his right. It was the one from the podium of his traveling faith show. He’d insisted that it should be polished daily, and it was. Yet, now it seemed to radiate a brilliance greater than ever.

He thought of his riches and his expensive possessions. When did he lose the nobility of his mission, the only possible redeeming fact of his nonbelief? He’d never noticed its departure. He thought of the mansions he built for himself—his treasures on earth. He thought of his lust, not love, for the woman he married. He thought of the arrogance of his disbelief.

He thought of the poor who’d doled out to him what they could ill afford. He did give them hope. He did strengthen their faith. But for him, God would not be pleased. What God valued most was what truly dwelt within one’s heart, and his heart held only himself. His remorse was fathomless.

Tears filled his eyes. As he arose from his seat, a glint from his Rolex caught his eye. Anger and self-loathing overwhelmed him. He ripped the watch from his wrist and slammed it hard against the desktop. Its very presence was yet another testament to his accursed fraudulence.

He looked at the bloody wrist from which it was torn. It hurt, and he was glad. He wrenched the diamond rings from his fingers and threw them across the room. He tore off his coat and ripped open his shirt, sending buttons flying. Tears burst from his eyes as he threw himself prostrate before the cross.

“My God, My God! I have not believed!” He sobbed as he beat his fists against his head. “How can you ever forgive me? My Jesus! I have denied you in my heart. You commanded me to help the poor and the lost, but I took from them to gather my wealth. How can I ever atone? How can I atone for my sins? What will you have me do? I will die for you! Guide me! Give me strength! Make me your servant! Please let it not be too late!”

For a while, he remained prostrate, weeping and trembling. Presently, exhausted, he pulled himself together and began to relax. I must open my mind and my heart, and Jesus will give me the answer.

It came to him slowly, a piece at a time. NASAs mission to Dolos will fail. It must fail. Jesus touched Johnston and had him call me. Why? To tell me about the asteroid. To tell me about the mission. Why would Jesus have him tell me? For atonement? So that I might stop the mission? Yes! That’s got to be it. But, how? “My Lord,” he said aloud, “please tell me how.”

Only a second more elapsed before Latterday found his answer. Johnston is a program engineer, he thought. He can stop the mission with a simple change in an algorithmic sequence—a simple change of a number. Thats it! That’s got to be it!

Latterday leapt up, grabbed the receiver, pressed the “scramble” button and punched in Johnston’s number. Only two rings elapsed before Johnston answered. “Hello,” he said. “Foster here.”

“Mr. Johnston, this is Latterday.”

“Yes sir, what can I do for you, reverend? Ask me anything.”

“You said you’re a program engineer. Do you run programming instructions for missions—for the rocket?” asked Latterday.

“Uh, yeah. I’m one of the programmers.” His voice dropped a bit. He sounded cautious, as though he were anticipating what Latterday was going to say.

“Foster, listen closely. This mission to Dolos must fail, and you will be the tool that God uses to make it fail. Think about it. You are God’s point man to see that this mission fails and the asteroid hits. Jesus is waiting to return, and you, Foster, you will assist Him.”

Except for the faint hum of some device in the background, Latterday was met with silence on the line.

“Foster Johnston. Did you hear me?” Latterday felt his heart thumping.

A short pause followed.

“Uh, yeah. I heard you.” Johnston lowered his voice almost to a whisper, as though someone was close by and he didn’t want to be overheard. “But I can’t do that. I can’t sabotage the mission. There are back-ups for everything, including me. Another programmer will be watching the data. He’d put a hold on the launch and fix any anomalies. And they would know that I was the one who entered the incorrect data. So it won’t work!

“Besides, why would God need me to do His work? Shouldn’t be a problem for a being that can create a universe. If He wants the mission stopped, He wouldn’t need a man, He’d just make a circuit short-out or hit the damned thing with lightenin’ or somethin’. No man can make it succeed if He wants it to fail.”

Latterday was undaunted. “Foster, God uses people all the time to execute his plans. I think you know that. Think about it. Why did you call me? It was God who had you do it. It’s clear that He wants to use you to stop the mission.”

“If that’s so,” reasoned Johnston, “if He really wants me to stop the mission, then why did He have me call you? It seems to me that He wants to use you, not me. No. I can’t do it, and it wouldn’t work even if I tried.”

Latterday paused. He was daunted. Why did God have him call me? If he wanted Johnston to stop the mission, wouldnt He simply move him to do it? Why me?

“Okay,” Latterday said with a tone of resignation, “I understand. I only hope you made the right decision. There must be another answer—another way. I don’t know. Thanks again for the information, Foster. By the way, when is the mission scheduled to launch?”

“Tomorrow morning at 0600 from Launch Complex thirty-nine-A,” Johnston said, allowing his voice to increase in volume. “You should be able to see it go. Can we still talk on Sunday?”

“Sure. We can talk after service, as I said. And, thanks again. Take care and God bless you.” Latterday hung up. There must be another way.

He leaned back in his chair, closed his eyes and prayed aloud. “My Lord, my God, please show me the way.” He let his mind relax. He tried to think of nothing. The image of the mission vehicle on the launch pad came to mind. It was obvious that after launch, there would be no way to stop the mission.

“How could I stop the launch?” He asked himself. “Blow it up? How would I do that? It would have to be hit with something.” His eyes opened wide. “A missile! Milton Baxter!” he shouted to the room.

Latterday recalled that Baxter was a devout member of the church, and the commander of a local militia group. He had told Latterday how happy he was to hear that the United Christian States’ new Constitution had been rewritten to conform to Biblical laws. Latterday had secretly deplored the event, but Baxter had been gleeful, especially because the changes included provisions that could be interpreted to legalize stoning in some cases, as prescribed in the Bible.

The initial plan appeared instantly in Latterday’s mind. He sat forward. “Computer activate,” he commanded. “Internet search, detailed map of Cape Canaveral Space Center.”

The computer obliged and he noted the location of Launch Complex 39-A. “Computer, zoom out, elevation five thousand feet.” He scanned the area, making mental note of the cape’s orientation. He felt success in the air.

Opening the top right-hand drawer of his desk, he retrieved a small phone book of members of his congregation. He located Baxter’s number. After setting the scramble mode, he punched it in. It occurred to him that the computers at InterSeF just might be able to unscramble the call. No one really knows these days, but if God was with him, it is likely they could not.

“Hello,” came a male voice.

“Milton Baxter?” asked Latterday.

“Who are you?” the man demanded.

“Peter John Latterday,” he said. It was his habit to give his full name. He still liked it.

“Oh, hi Reverend. Yes, this is Milton. Sorry, I didn’t recognize your voice. What can I do for you?”

Latterday first reminded Baxter of the End Times events he had preached for years. He concluded by listing the latest world disasters and telling him of the incoming asteroid and NASA’s mission to deflect it. It took only seconds to convince him that the impact would bring about the end of the tribulation—the final blow that would trigger the return of Jesus to collect the faithful from the four winds.

“Milton, the mission must fail, and I need your help to make it fail.”

“How can I help, sir?” Baxter sounded like a private snapping to attention in response to a command from his platoon leader. Latterday felt encouraged.

“You have weapons. Do you have, or can you get hold of a heat-seeking missile and launcher?”

There was no hesitation. “Got three of ’em. Latest Pakistani Stingers—very accurate—even better’n the Raytheon five ninety-two,” said Baxter proudly. He correctly guessed where Latterday was going. “They got almost a three mile effective range, but NASA’s security’s gonna be tighter than a chickadee’s ass . . . uh, sorry, I mean it’ll be tighter than ever. The only way I could get close enough would be from the sea and I’m not really sure even then I could get within range. There’d be fast Coast Guard boats in the water and interceptors in the air. Which pad will it be launched from?”

“Thirty nine-A,” said Latterday.

“Well, I know where that is. It’s certainly within range from the water, but uh, I donno. My unit has an old Swift Boat,” he said, chuckling. “We’ve joined Xe, ye know—the old Blackwater outfit from back in the early days of the Iraq war. They changed their name ’cause of a lotta heat they were gettin’ for . . . uh, doin’ their job. They’re now a part of InterSeF, so we can get pretty much what we want. That’s how we got the boat and the Stingers. ‘Cept ours ain’t faulty.” He chuckled again.

His voice became serious. “It’s a pretty fast boat, Reverend, but they’d see me comin’ and I’d be blown out of the water with a missile or a Vulcan Phalanx before I’d ever get within range. Them new Vulcans can spit out five thousand rounds a minute—sounds like a lawn mower at full throttle and ya can’t even see a gap between the flying tracers. Besides, before I could shoot, I’d have to be completely stopped in the water and fire at the very moment of the launch, or that baby’d be gone.”

Latterday thought quickly, and then it came to him just as though Jesus himself were whispering in his ear. “It’ll work! It’ll be a two pronged attack,” he said excitedly. “I have a private jet and I have my pilot license. You come in fast from the sea—from due east. Be in place ready to fire at exactly 0600. I’ll come in from north northeast, just off the beach, fast and low, under the radar at 0559. Whichever one of us they see first will become a diversion, and the other will follow through and accomplish the mission.”

“Uh, I donno,” said Baxter, backing off. “Security’s mighty heavy and tight. Likely, they’d see us both, especially me, ’cause I’d have to be inside their security zone several minutes before launch. Uh, besides, if God wants the mission to fail, then cain’t He do it Hisself? I mean, He’s all powerful and all that.”

For the next five minutes, Latterday gave Baxter the best glory-sermon he’d ever preached on redemption and atonement. It was also the first sincere one since before his traveling faith show. At the end, both men were in tears, convinced that God was behind them all the way and that they would spend eternity in the loving arms of their savior.

After Latterday hung up, he called the pilot service at the airport to check on the weather. Some days the airport shuts down because the ash cloud is too low. He was in luck. The cloud is expected to bottom out at two thousand feet. That’s low, but certainly flyable. It’s another sign! he thought.

He left the office and stopped off at the bank before heading home. He’d need to call his personal pilot and get to bed early.

Latterday arose well before dawn Saturday morning. Having filed a flight plan for Jacksonville, and having given his pilot instructions to have the jet prepped, fueled, and ready for take-off at 0515, he made his way to the airport as a faint grayness in the eastern sky foretold the coming of dawn.

As he drove, he noticed a bright glimmer of light in the east and after determining it was not an airplane, but the planet Venus, he was thrilled. The ash cloud had apparently thinned unexpectedly, allowing Venus to hang like a diamond in the eastern sky, its true brilliance slightly blunted. Still, it was lovely to behold.

To Latterday, the unusual clarity and beauty of the morning was another sign from God meant specifically for him. He felt another thrill as he strode through the terminal and out onto the tarmac where his jet was waiting, its twin engines whining in anticipation of a rare skyward leap. His pilot stood by the boarding steps.

“Thank you Mike,” he said, handing the man a cashier’s check. “I’ll take it from here.”

“Uh, Yessir,” said Mike, taking the check without looking at it. There was concern in his voice. “But, you’re supposed to have a copilot. You sure you don’t want me to . . .”

“No thanks, Mike. I won’t be up but a few minutes. I want to feel the thrill, alone.”

Just as Latterday mounted the steps, he barely heard his pilot exclaim, “My God!”

Latterday chuckled. Obviously, no one had ever given the man a cashier’s check for a hundred-thousand dollars. He had left his wife a check for three million. The rest he had bequeathed to a children’s charity. At least the money would do some good until the end.

As he activated the step retraction and reached to close the door, he saw his pilot standing in the same place gaping up at him. Latterday smiled and waved the back of his hand as though warding off a fly. The pilot began to back up, still staring at him as the door closed.

Latterday made his way to the cockpit, seated himself and strapped in. He checked the clock on the instrument panel. It was 0515. All was going well.

Milton Baxter was a big man, strong of body, strong of opinion, and strong of will. Having dropped out of school after the ninth grade, he’d worked in various low-wage service jobs until he was seventeen and obtained a general education degree along the way.

It was during this period that the ever-present InterSeF ads hawking the adventure, honor, and challenge of combat, sparked his imagination and tugged at his yearning to go places and to be somebody.

He began to fancy himself one of those soldiers he saw on billboards—those rugged and fearless men with muscular biceps, fighting the Muslims for God and country. This is what a real man does. So, with eyes filled with glory, he enlisted. After basic training, he opted for special warfare school and ranger training—that was what real men did.

He quickly adapted to the authoritarian way of military life. He found that he liked the challenge, the danger and the intensity of blood and guts combat. He felt himself destined to achieve a high place of honor among his countrymen.

Yet, it was not to be. On the first mission of his third tour of duty, he was wounded during an extraction from Babol Sar, Iran. The helicopter had barely risen to treetop level when the Revolutionary Guard broke from the tree line and opened fire. Bullets ripped away his right cheekbone and shattered his right femur. The crippled chopper barely made it back to safety.

It was during convalescence that he met Linda, a nurse on staff at the Veterans Hospital. He was thoroughly smitten with her. It was the first time in his life that he found himself caring deeply for anyone. After a short courtship, they were married, and he left the service. Their son was born a year later.

Baxter worked in construction for a short time, and eventually formed his own company contracting with the Corporation to lay concrete driveways for homes and businesses.

He was doing well for a high school dropout, and for the first few years, he was happy. He had cheered when the neocons regained total power in Washington, and was happy to see the purge of liberal teachers and college professors. He was pleased to see needless and wasteful, socialist programs and governmental departments abolished or privatized.

Yet all those promises of prosperity through smaller government, deregulation, and an unfettered free market proved to be false. Instead of the government, the Corporation had become the oppressor, manipulating the market and forever increasing its profits at the expense of workers and consumers.

Deregulation of the Corporation’s food industry and the subsequent loss of government oversight had resulted in ever increasing mass food poisonings, causing him to be wary of what his family consumed. In spite of earlier promises of lower prices in a market deregulated and united under one, unifying company, prices had been skyrocketing ever since the Corporation became the last man standing in international trade.

Still, Baxter wasn’t too concerned. The Corporation’s buyout of all public institutions of learning resulted in a hefty tuition requirement to place a child in any school at any age, thus driving millions of families from the educational process. Consequently, the boom in available labor became a boon for Baxter’s company. Wages were falling even more, so he had his pick of the best workers, and the wealthy were building larger mansions, which called for longer driveways.

So, he was doing just fine. The plight of others was simply the price of freedom. If people couldn’t make it on their own, as he had, that was just too bad for them. It was their fault. He and the Corporation had to make a profit, and for a while, he accepted the Corporation’s excuse for increasing prices and fees. There were wars to be fought and the ash cloud caused much shorter growing seasons everywhere. Besides, he was among the self-made, fortunate few who could still afford to live an upper middle class lifestyle, send his son to school, and buy the higher priced but safer food from the local farmers’ market and fishing docks.

But then, the police force and the fire department were privatized. His taxes went down significantly, true enough, but the fees for those unregulated services were rising rapidly, far more than wiping out the gain from reduced taxes. Indeed, the Corporation had recently informed homeowners that their insurance would no longer cover the cost of the fire department. They would have to buy a separate fire insurance policy. That made him angry.

Since the Veterans Administration was abolished just a year ago, he was forced to purchase private health insurance for his family from TransWorld Biometrics, now the health industrial arm of TiConGlobal. He could afford it, but the policy would not cover the problems he was developing as a result of his war wounds because the Corporation would not cover preexisting conditions. That, too, made him angry.

Then the Corporation informed him that the price of his construction material would almost double in the coming months, and his family’s health insurance premiums would increase by fifteen percent next year. To boot, his deductible would increase as well, just as it did last year. Yet the corporate elite continued to receive billions in bonuses every year. Baxter couldn’t imagine someone having such an income. That made him angrier.

Thus, even as Baxter’s income slowly increased, at the end of the month, he found that his discretionary cash decreased. And although he had saved a considerable sum in the bank, he finally realized that he was just one serious illness away from bankruptcy. His income was entirely dependent on his health despite the high premiums he was paying for insurance.

So Baxter was frustrated, suspicious, and angry. He was ready to strike out at something, or someone. Latterday not only provided the target, but a promise of an eternal utopia in the hereafter.

He had intended to slip out early without awakening Linda, but things didn’t go as planned. He arose quietly, and in the dimness of the nightlight, slipped into his clothing. He stood by the bed for a moment looking at her. He wanted to lie back down and feel her beside him one more time, but he thought of his mission, and suppressed the emotion.

He left the door ajar as he left the bedroom, flipped on the hall light, and went to check in on Devin, his five-year-old son. The child was asleep. He moved to his bedside and looked at him for a long moment. That was when the first doubt formed in his mind, and it was heavy.

What will happen to him after I’m gone? What will become of Linda? Latterday didn’t say how long it would be before the asteroid hits, and if I’m killed in an attack on the launch vehicle, the Corporation won’t pay off on my life insurance. And we may not even succeed. Dolos might be diverted after all.

He thought of how happy Devin was playing catch with him, and wrestling together on the living room floor. He could hear the giggling. It was a beautiful sound. He thought of the fishing trip they had taken just last week. It was Devin’s first, and he recalled how glad he was when Devin caught the biggest fish. He recalled how much he was looking forward to taking him on his first hunting trip when he turned six. He would teach him gun safety and wildlife conservation. He would teach him how to survive on his own in the woods. Should Devin not experience those things, even if there isn’t much time left?

He felt the hollowness of anxiety deepen as he looked down at his son’s innocent face. He closed his eyes, suppressing the wave of emotion that was bringing him close to tears.

Steeling himself, he thought again of the mission. He thought of Latterday’s words of redemption and the glory of being an instrument of God’s will. He turned and left the room. He’d see his son again in paradise.

Milton returned to the bedroom where his wife lay sleeping. It was chilly outside, and he’d forgotten to get his winter coat. The air would be cold out on the water. He quietly slid open the closet louvered doors and retrieved the coat. When it closed, it bumped. With his mind so focused on the mission, he’d forgotten it always did that. He’d been meaning to fix it for years.

Linda awakened. “Darling, where are you going?” She lifted herself up on an elbow, her eyes squinting against the shaft of light from the hallway.

He moved to the bed, sat on the edge, bent over and kissed her on the forehead. He ran his fingers through her hair. He gazed into her eyes for a brief moment, and then held her face in his hands.

Anxiety returned with a vengeance. “God,” he said, shaking his head slowly. “I love you so much.” Involuntarily, tears seeped from his eyes. After nine years of marriage, he did indeed love her dearly, and never had he felt it more than at this moment.

Her eyes widened. “What are you going to do?” she asked with alarm.

“Just a training mission,” he lied. “The men and I are taking the boat out for training. It’s somethin’ I have to do. Now, go back to sleep.”

He knew she didn’t believe him. He wasn’t given to emotional departures before training exercises and he’d always told her of them well in advance. But as he gazed into her eyes, knowing he may never see her again, he could not contain himself.

She became frantic. “You’re going to do something bad, aren’t you? What are you going to do?” She threw her arms around him and pulled him down to the bed. “Whatever it is, don’t, please don’t do it! It’ll work itself out without you.” She began to shudder and cry. “Please don’t go! I won’t let you go! I won’t let you go!”

“What’s the matter mommy?” came a child’s frightened voice from the doorway.

Latterday felt the usual rush as he set the brakes and powered up for an instrument check at the end of runway 27. After testing the flight controls—the ailerons, elevator and rudder—he lowered the wing flaps thirty degrees to provide additional lift for take-off. Glancing over the instruments, he set the altimeter to zero. Just habit. He really didn’t need to fine-tune it. He would be flying by sight, and after the initial climb-out, he would have little care for what it said. He scanned the instrument panel. The aircraft was flight ready.

He slipped his headphones on, keyed the mike, and gave his tail number. “November Juliet-seven-three-five-Charlie-Tango ready to roll,” he told the tower.

“November Juliet-seven-three-five-Charlie-Tango,” came the voice of controller Dallas Redman, “you’re cleared for runway two-seven to an altitude of one-five-zero-zero feet. Be advised ash altitude is two thousand, winds eight knots northwest, squawk four-two-zero-zero.

“Also be advised extended flight restrictions are in force due to operations at Cape Canaveral. You have a restriction variance for headings no less than two-zero-zero degrees and no more than three-zero degrees after you pass the outer marker. Enjoy your flight, Reverend, and God bless you.”

Latterday took a deep breath as he set his transponder to the assigned squawk frequency—a frequency enabling Air Traffic Control to identify him and his flight characteristics on their radar.

“God bless you, Dallas,” he said softly into the mike, knowing those would be the last words he would ever say to anyone on earth.

Powering up to maximum thrust, he released the brakes and the jet leapt forward, pressing him back in his seat. The runway rushed by. Easing back on the yoke, he felt the instant the wheels left the runway. He flipped a toggle on the instrument panel to retract the landing gear. Seconds later, he retracted the flaps and felt a moment’s decrease in gravity from the reduced lift.

Climbing straight out, he watched the southern end of South Lake slip beneath him. At fifteen hundred feet, he powered back to cruise velocity, leveled off, and set the trim. A light blinked on the instrument panel, accompanied by a series of beeps indicating the outer marker. He banked right to a heading of 30 degrees, toward the ocean. Having cleared the coastline, he turned off his transponder, breaking the electronic link with Air Traffic Control, then pushed the jet into a short dive, feeling the floating sensation caused by the loss of gravity. He leveled off at what he guessed was a safe distance above the waves. He felt proud of his performance.

About five minutes out, he banked left, made a wide arc, and straightened out on a westward heading, back toward land. Banking left again, he came to a heading of 190 degrees, directly toward the cape, and Launch Complex 39-A.

A voice startled him. “November Juliet-seven-three-five-Charlie Tango, this is Titusville Control, do you read?” There was a short pause, then a repeat with increased volume. The voice was laced with anxiety. “November Juliet, seven . . .”

He turned off the radio, removed the headphones, and tossed them to the copilot’s seat. A serene calmness washed through him. The view from his cockpit window seemed surreal as fishing boats appeared, and then vanished to the right and left beneath him. He made slight adjustments in his course so as not to fly directly over the boats, as the wall of air built up by the passage of his jet could be disastrous for smaller ones.

The beach was filling with people early, as many had anticipated the NASA launch. It was likely many of them were there as a result of the conspiracy theories about the mission that have been clogging the Internet. The most popular—spurred by, and linked to a report of unusual activity in the launch of a probe two years ago—was that an asteroid was heading for a collision with the earth and this mission was an attempt to divert it. It had proved a boon for Latterday as the amount of cash in church collection plates had skyrocketed, along with gun sales and survival gear.

That particular hypothesis was augmented by the fact that Russia and China were known to be mounting missions of their own. How much the Corporation was involved no one knew, but it seemed clear that something serious was afoot, and the public was getting nervous.

Back at Air Traffic Control, Latterday knew that emergency operations would already be under way. Search and rescue aircraft would soon be taking off. Did they contact NASA? Would the interceptors be waiting for him? Would Baxter make it through if he didn’t? Was Baxter in place? He looked at the clock on the instrument panel. It was 0558. Baxter should be in place by now.

He looked southeast and strained his eyes across the waves. There were boats on the horizon and one about two miles away, under power and moving in his direction. But in that position, it couldn’t be Baxter. He would have been much closer and not moving. It had to be a patrol boat.

Looking forward toward the cape, he could see Launch Complex 39-A and the mission vehicle, poised for launch. He wondered if the nuclear device would detonate on impact. Tens of thousands, perhaps even a million, would die. Didn’t matter. They would die with him. Can’t be helped. Everyone but the chosen will soon be dead anyway.

He wondered, too, if the launch might be on hold. That didn’t matter either. It would take them a long time to assemble another vehicle, and since God moved him to attack this one, He would move others in China and Russia to attack theirs.

He glanced across the water on his left. Baxter wasn’t there. He would surely see him by now if he were.

Latterday’s heart sank as a solid line of tracer bullets flashed past the cockpit window. Ignoring the tracers, he looked back at the launch pad. It was growing larger by the millisecond.

There was movement high in his peripheral vision. He glanced up and left—to his ten o’clock position. Two black specks moving toward him quickly grew into interceptors. He saw the corkscrewing white smoke of four missiles and at the same time, heard the rapid thump of bullets perforating his fuselage.

He looked back at the launch vehicle, now only seconds away, rapidly filling his windshield. “Oh God,” he prayed. “Oh my savior, into thy hands I commit my . . .”

STEVIA: a Great, Natural, Non-chemical Sugar Substitute

Let not thine eyes glaze over, for the food shall set thee free!

This subject might seem to be a deviation from my theme of empathy, but it is not. Mental and physical health is both a necessary ingredient to, and a result of universal empathy.

If we could vertically eliminate or greatly reduce the current epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease, why would we not do it and how could it be done? The answer is more interesting than one might think.

Here is how to do it:

Remove sugar and chemical sugar substitutes from our family diet. It is not too difficult, although it is difficult to eliminate sugar altogether because it is in virtually all processed products on the grocery shelves. Still, consumption can be reduced to a minimum, especially if you buy mostly unprocessed foods and buy, if you must, processed foods that contain the least amount of sugar.

To be more socially empathetic, we can join together at the local level, attend school board meetings and call for all soft drink dispensers and sugary desserts to be removed from schools. As long as it is available, your kids likely will consume them.

But, you and your family love your desserts? Schools resist? No problem. We can do an end-run around bland foods and the bureaucracy.

From The Candida Diet: The Stevia Plant

From The Candida Diet

              From The Candida Diet

The best substitute for sugar is, as I have found in my research, highly refined, pure stevia (Rebaudioside A, also called Reb-A and rebiana). Stevia is not an artificial, chemical compound, but a refined plant derivative that has been used by other nations around the world for hundreds of years with no known ill effects on health, and some studies have found possible benefits for diabetics.

And, no, I have no stock in the industry and have no connection at all other than buying the product for myself.—-

A field of sweetness

                A field of sweetness

Here are some facts about stevia:

One teaspoon of pure stevia (no fillers) is equal to one cup of sugar. So, while Stevia, by equal volume, is more expensive than sugar, one only uses a very small amount (about 1/48 as much as sugar) for one’s dessert, candy, or coffee. This drops the cost to very acceptable levels–possibly even less than the cost of sugar (although I haven’t done all the math–I really don’t care if it is a few pennies more).

Pure stevia–with no filler–can be purchased on the Internet, and one can purchase it in bulk or in packets. The packets (like the packets of artificial sweeteners at convenient store coffee counters) make it much easier to determine the correct amount you want, and get it right every time. Buying the bulk containers (no fillers) is less expensive, but, until you get used to measuring it out, it can be just a bit iffy.

Be very careful when purchasing on the Internet. Be sure to read the “Ingredients” on the label to determine if it contains fillers (anything other than Rebaudioside A, also called Reb-A and rebiana). If sugar alcohols are present, the product contains filler.

* * *

So, if Stevia is the best sugar substitute (0 on the glycemic index, 0 calories), why is it difficult or impossible to find in super markets?

Follow the money!

Here is a little history of the politics that led to greater wealth for some, and poor health (sometimes death) for the rest of us:

Enter Donald Rumsfeld, onetime CEO of G.D. Searle (the corporation that created Aspartame–a chemical sugar substitute having probable health risks–and is a component of many diet soft drinks). Rumsfeld, as most folks know, is a neoconservative of the first order with long-time White House connections!

Shortly after Reagan came into office, the FDA approved Aspartame as an artificial sweeter, even though there was little know of its possible health risks. (Anyone want to guess who was a close friend of Reagan?) In 1991, the FDA, still composed of mostly Reagan appointees, effectively banned Stevia from importation into the U.S. (anyone what to guess who would financially benefit from that ban?)

Over the decades, likely because of the Internet, Stevia has become more widely known. The food industry and the artificial sweetener industry could no longer hide the facts and block its sale. People were beginning to buy Stevia over the Internet, and it could be found in health food stores (although the labels were not allowed to call it a sugar substitute or a sweetener).

The product has become more popular, even against political resistance and corporate-paid “research.” One can still find misinformation all over the Internet. Products are, however, now on supermarket shelves, using the usual deceptive Wall Street advertising and packaging for big profits. The products on your grocery store shelves that now contain Stevia, and claim to be Stevia, are deceptive. The individual packages and bulk containers are mostly cheep fillers, contrary to their names (“Truvia,” “Stevia in the Raw,” ” PureVia”). Sound so honest and pure, doesn’t they? Yes, Stevie is in the product, but with a much greater amount of filler. The chemical filler, itself, may not be so healthy. Last I read, the pure form of Stevia is still not in supermarkets.

Stevia products are marketed under the brand names Truvia and PureVia, but the packets are not just rebiana. Both Truvia and PureVia contain erythritol, a low-calorie sugar alcohol sweetener. One packet of Truvia (3.5 grams) contains 3 grams of erythritol, and “natural flavors” of undisclosed chemical composition.

Lastly, one caution to using stevia; you must use the proper amount. Too much will not taste good (too much sugar doesn’t either), but the right amount will have the great side effects of not leaving one’s lips sticky, will not add to your calorie intake, and will not rot the teeth. Also, it is heat resistant–you can bake with it.

I drink 4 cups of coffee every morning sweetened with stevia (from bulk containers of 0.7 oz) and periodically make delicious fudge and brownies (yes, I can cook).

Love the stuff. I am borderline diabetic (type 2) and have been for years. Why do I not have full blown diabetes? Stevia, diet, and exercise–and no soft drinks! Virtually all diet soft drinks are sweetened with chemicals, and are still harmful to diabetics.


— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel.  What would the world be like if empathy, not self interest, were our primary motivating force?

A free chapter from The Empathy Imperative will be on this site soon.

ACTS OF EMPATHY: How to Spread the Warmth

This post needs no comments from me.

— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel.

What would the world be like if empathy, not self interest, were our primary motivating force?

Brazil’s “biggest shame in history?” Really?

Let me first be clear. I am not opposed to non-pugilistic sports of any kind. Indeed, nations should continue their internal and international games. It is a superb way for societies to interact.

As Important as I feel sports to be, however, they should not be our highest priority.

Sao Paulo's Itaquerão stadium Photo from

Sao Paulo’s Itaquerão stadium
Photo from

To put things into prospective, the Sao Paulo’s Itaquerão stadium, home to the 2014 World Cup games, was built at the cost to the citizens for $350-million.

Residents in the area say that their taxes rose between 20 and 35 percent. A short distance from this beautiful stadium live about 4,800 homeless people, (men, women, and children).

The Brazilian sports newspaper Lance called Brazil’s loss to their team’s bid to win the soccer World Cup, “the biggest shame in history.” Really? Brazil’s biggest shame in history? How about the rampant, abject poverty in Brazil? No shame there?

Brazilian homeless Photo: Elizabeth Gorman/Al Jazeera

Photo: Elizabeth Gorman/Al Jazeera

Indifference to poverty in any country is a disgrace, and most, if not all countries have an overabundance of it–including the USA.

All societies should be judged by how they treat the least of their citizens. In the USA, there is an ever widening gap between the wealthy and the poor, and conservatives, who claim to be “family values” Christians, are fighting fang and claw to keep it that way.

Photo: Elizabeth Gorman/Al Jazeera

Photo: Elizabeth Gorman/Al Jazeera

Arrogance (self aggrandizement) and indifference fuel poverty and war. It seem the world has at least another millennium to go before it gets its priorities in proper order.

Most of us judge ourselves in comparison to others in society. It’s natural do do so. We can see that we are financially better off than many, but not as financially secure as others. Yet our focus is mainly on ourselves–our position in society relative to those with greater wealth.

Should we not be more concerned with those who have little or nothing? No one wants to live in abject poverty. Would it not be a greater good if everyone worked for the benefit of others? This view, of course, is considered naive by many, and indeed it is, given our present day world with its attitudes of dominance, profit, and self righteousness. But we have slowly advanced from where we’ve been in history. There are, today, more of us who can see the benefits of universal empathy. There are more of us who do unto others as we would have them do unto us. In time, there will be many more. We can only hope humanity survives to see the world we envision.

— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel based on the epic struggle between religion and science, and brings the true nature of justice, mercy, and love into sharp focus.  What would the world be like if empathy, not self interest, were our primary motivating force?


The illusion of separateness

This is a re-blog from


Life Is Not An Error

My horizons know no bounds, dimensionless I pass through with no sound; through dimensions, vacuous, folded and entangled so I am the golden thread oscillating a heavenly glow, binding strings in a perpetual state of flow. As thick as a Planck are those who insist they are alone and separate from all around them; for once we were all in union and hence forever in communion and unison despite an illusionary range. Believe me not? Then just ask the cat locked inside the box and ignore that sly fox, whom asks that you merely shake the box to hear it meow! Understand the entanglement, the oscillations and vibrations that echo silently and abundantly through all. This Earth and you are but one expression of me but one I love dearly so, so I bring you this message on the illusion of your separateness and the rarity of your sentient glow…

View original post 49 more words

GITMO: An Enduring Symbol of Conservative Shame and Dishonor

I have written much about the meaning of empathy and benevolent reciprocity. This entry is about what these concepts are not.

Guantanamo Bay prison Camp (Gitmo), located at the southern tip of Cuba, is a major source of frustration for me. The Bush Administration brought deep shame to the U.S. with their Gulag Archipelago of torture camps–torture of suspected terrorists, many of whom were completely innocent, having been the victims of the U.S. policy of handsomely paying “snitches” to finger people with terrorist links. Quite obviously, many thusly accused were those with whom the “informer” had a personal grudge and had no connection to terrorism at all.They were well paid simply to get rid of someone they didn’t like. Quite a temptation, wouldn’t you think?

Image from


Today, with 154 untried prisoners in perpetual political limbo, Gitmo still stands as a black symbol to our shame. Conservatives blocked President Obama’s two attempts to close the camp. On his first day in office, the president signed an Executive Order to shut down the camp and try the prisoners in the U.S. The conservatives squealed like angered chimps, leaped about, shook branches, and then blocked funding for the shutdown and transfer. This inhuman action has continued, along with fighting and blocking other policies and legislation, and it is all with pointed political purpose—to make the president appear to have broken his promises, turn the voters away from him, and thereby regain power. For the conservatives, it’s all about politics and power.

Patriotism is defined, in part, as devotion to one’s country, especially the ideals set by its founders. George Washington, for example, after capturing 1,000 Hessians at the Battle of Trenton, ordered that they be treated with the same rights for which our young nation was fighting. After the Battle of Princeton, Washington wrote of the prisoners; “Treat them with humanity, and let them have no reason to Complain of our Copying the brutal example of the British Army in their treatment of our unfortunate brethren…. Provide everything necessary for them on the road.” 

By continuing to honor this concept of kind treatment for our enemy prisoners, we gained the moral high ground around the world. We were highly respected for this, and a few other nations soon followed. We were leading by example! This is why, in the closing days of WWII, German troops went out of their way to surrender to U.S. troops instead of the Russians.

Will conservatives in this nation ever wake up and realize that their “leaders” are not patriots and certainly are not honorable men, but turncoats to the values that made our nation great? Will the conservative base ever be able to put themselves in the place of an innocent prisoner, tortured and held for life without trial? Think about it. What a living hell it must be. Where is the humanity? Where is the empathy? Where is our honor?

— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel based on the epic struggle between religion and science, and brings the true nature of justice, mercy, and love into sharp focus.  What sort of world would a truly benevolent god have created?

HOMOSEXUALITY: Perception and Fear v. Reality and Reason

I have been arguing that universal empathy is the only path to peace and that organized religion builds walls that block the path. Few subjects make my case better than this one. Around the world in many countries, social and political forces work feverishly to suppress homosexual behavior. In the U.S., religious/social conservatives try to establish laws against same gender marriages.

In at least 10 countries, homosexuality may be punishable by execution. Why are homosexuals so feared? Homosexuality isn’t a disease, communicable or otherwise. It affects no one detrimentally.

Among the most favored arguments is that everyone’s sexuality is a choice. Yet, if you ask, I suspect most heterosexuals will deny they’ve ever been romantically attracted to their same gender (I’d love to get comments in this particular assertion).

Still, I can judge with certainty, only one person–myself. I’ve never been romantically attracted to another male. Am I to assume I am different from most folks? Are all conservatives, who make the choice-argument, really bisexual–equally attracted to both genders? I think not.

I offer four rational arguments that I hope most readers will spread:

1) Natural Law: When their biblical argument against homosexuality does nothing to convince lawmakers to make laws against same gender marriage, social conservatives turn to the deceptive and bogus “Natural Law” argument. They claim that in order to determine how humans are genetically programmed–how they should naturally act (unspoken: according to God’s Law)–we draw our conclusions from nature. Yet, it appears that few religious conservatives know much about nature.

The Catholic Church is a good example, as well as conservative Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States (and most in Congress). The Roman Catholic bishops, when Illinois legislators approved civil unions in 2011, said “Marriage comes to us from nature. . .That’s based on the complementarity of the two sexes in such a way that the love of a man and a woman joined in a marital union is open to life, and that’s how families are created and society goes along. … It’s not in our doctrine. It’s not a matter of faith. It’s a matter of reason and understanding the way nature operates.”

Never mind the thinly veiled and false statement that “it’s not a matter of faith,” just a modicum of research would have told them that their uninformed opinion is not the way nature operates. It took me about five seconds to find the facts. Same gender attraction and sexual play occurs naturally in many species besides Homo sapiens. Among the best examples is the bonobo, sometimes called the pygmy chimpanzee. Research on this can easily be found online.

2) Science: A phenotype is a genetic trait that manifests physically (easily seen by the eye). A genotype is a genetic trait that manifests psychologically–a predisposition to certain behaviors, such as sexual attraction (heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual).

      a. Phenotype: An estimated 1 in 4,500 infants are born with ambiguous genitalia. This is a condition in which the gender of a baby cannot be determined, having both male and female reproductive organs. This situation can become tragic when parents decide which gender they believe, or want their child to be, and then order the surgery. As the child grows, he/she discovers that the parents made the wrong choice. The question now becomes; Would religious conservatives deny that person’s right to pursue happiness by marrying a person of the same (apparent) gender?

      b. Genotype: Recall that “genotype” is really all those genetically predetermined behavioral characteristics of any person. Therefore, the genes predisposition a person to be romantically attracted to the opposite gender, the same gender, or to both genders (think of the indisputable variations in phenotype).

3) Strict Constitutionality: The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment forbids the government from making laws respecting an establishment of religion. This is made applicable to the states by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Anti marriage laws are based solidly in religion. These laws represent government recognition and support of the theological belief of an establishment of religion, and are therefore, strictly unconstitutional. To fully understand the intent of the Establishment Clause, see Thomas Jefferson’s The Virginia Act for Establishing Religious Freedom. This is the document from which the Establishment Clause was crafted.

4) Reason: Religious conservatives are often complaining that the government should stay out of their lives. They call it “intrusive government.” Yet, they are quick to use government as a blunt instrument with which to bludgeon the rest of society into living by their religious beliefs. This should be pointed out by people of empathy at every opportunity.

What is wrong with allowing every citizen, in this “land of the free,” to seek happiness according to the dictates of his or her own conscience–the same right social conservatives claim for themselves?

— Max T. Furr is author of The Empathy Imperative, a philosophical novel that brings the true nature of justice, mercy, and love into sharp focus. It must be read with an open mind. What sort of world would a truly benevolent god have created?

When Civil Rights and Libertarianism Collide

Image   What does it take to create a harmonious civil society? Individual rights are extremely important, but so are civil rights. Should individual rights trump civil rights? For me, a recent exchange of opinions with a self described libertarian on the social blog, SodaHead, highlighted this conflict.

First, I understand the position of the libertarian and I do sympathize. Libertarians believe that the individual is the sole arbiter of his associations, and not the government. I agree to an extent, but I argue that for the purpose of building and maintaining a civil society, there must be at least two exceptions, e.g., commerce and religion.

This clash of rights came to light lately when a baker refused his service to a gay wedding. The baker was not required to attend the wedding, but simply to bake and decorate the cake. He based his refusal on his religious beliefs. At first blush, one would tend to agree with the baker. After all, we do have the right to practice our religions. Yet, this practice sometimes runs afoul of law, which is the manifestation of the government’s obligation to guarantee all citizens equal access to commerce.

The government (We the People), have a compelling interest in the promotion of a civil society. While the baker, in his private life, has a sovereign right to association, in his business practices, he does not have the right to select which customers he will not serve. The gay couple’s right to equal access to commerce outweighs whatever right he may think he has for refusing his service.

He who has a business open to the public, must serve the public. Besides, the baker is not being forced to associate on a social bases with them, he is merely obligated to operate his business as usual, even if his cake does have two male or female figurines on top. This case illustrates my argument that religion is often divisive–a major hindrance to peace and harmony. Were the baker to follow the path of benevolent reciprocity–do unto others as you would have them do unto you–empathy would have dictated his actions. We should not be in the business of building walls, but dismantling those we’ve built.

Previous Older Entries

john pavlovitz

Stuff That Needs To Be Said

Religion in Public

exploring the mix of sacred and secular


The sage of Baltimore lives on

Free to express

thoughts, experiences, travel, feelings, stories, diaries and many more...


Because we’re all recovering from something.

With My Face To The Rising Sun

Diary Of A Mad God Woman

The Free-Thinking Human

Just Another Former Christian on the Internet

Lama Surya Das

Spiritual Masters of Asia

The Charnel-House

From Bauhaus to Beinhaus

Friend the Cat

Everyone Needs A Friend.

Toad's Great Adventure

"I will, then, be a toad." -- Stephen Crane

Notes from the U.K.

Exploring the spidery corners of a culture and the weird stuff that tourist brochures ignore.


A broad blogs broadly on women’s & men's psychology: sex, relationships, equality

العاب بنات ماهر

العاب بنات ماهر العاب فلاش ماهر ttt4 العاب سيارات ماهر العاب تلبيس بنات ماهر العاب فلاش ماهر 2015

My Holistic Table

The Art & Science of Cooking. Recipes free of gluten, sugar, dairy, yeast

The Arm Chair Pontificator

Satirical & Poetic Musings Of A Self-Proclaimed Nobel Prize Winner

A Narcissist Writes Letters, To Himself

A Hopefully Formerly Depressed Human Vows To Practice Self-Approval

Ben's Bitter Blog

"We make bitter better."

All Romance Reads

Get Your Swoon On


Independence and Freedom Blog

A Holistic Journey

Finding my way back out of motherhood -- while mothering

Ben Garrido's Author Page

Literary Adventures in South Korea

Victoria NeuroNotes

Into the Gray

%d bloggers like this: